Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.84 seconds)

State Of Bihar vs Upendra Narayan Singh & Ors on 20 March, 2009

18. At one time this Court had been of the view that calling the names from Employment Exchange would curb to certain extent the menace of nepotism and corruption in public employment. But, later on, came to the conclusion that some appropriate method consistent with the requirements of Article 16 should be followed. In other words there must be a notice published in the appropriate manner calling for applications and all those who apply in response thereto should be considered fairly. Even if the names of candidates are requisitioned from Employment Exchange, in addition thereto it is mandatory on the part of the employer to invite applications from all 18 eligible candidates from the open market by advertising the vacancies in newspapers having wide circulation or by announcement in Radio and Television as merely calling the names from the Employment Exchange does not meet the requirement of the said Article of the Constitution. (Vide: Delhi Development Horticulture Employees' Union v. Delhi Administration, Delhi & Ors., AIR 1992 SC 789; State of Haryana & Ors. v. Piara Singh & Ors., AIR 1992 SC 2130; Excise Superintendent Malkapatnam, Krishna District, A.P. v. K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao & Ors., (1996) 6 SCC 216; Arun Tewari & Ors. v. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh & Ors., AIR 1998 SC 331; Binod Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Ram Ashray Mahoto & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 2103; National Fertilizers Ltd. & Ors. v. Somvir Singh, AIR 2006 SC 2319; Telecom District Manager & Ors. v. Keshab Deb, (2008) 8 SCC 402; State of Bihar v. Upendra Narayan Singh & Ors., (2009) 5 SCC 65; and State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. v. Mohd. Ibrahim, (2009) 15 SCC 214).
Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 607 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

State Of Orissa & Anr vs Mamata Mohanty on 9 February, 2011

29 The copy of this judgment is directed to be circulated to the Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu for strict compliance, to see that all public posts in future are filled up, as per the law declared by Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Orissa and another vs. Mamata Mohanty (2011(2) SCT 718). The Chief Secretary is further directed to place compliance report in this Court within one month of receipt of copy of this order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 995 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next