Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.27 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Arun Kumar Aggarwal vs State Of M.P.& Ors on 2 September, 2011
While saying so, I am also fortified by the judgment of Division
Banch of Hon'ble High Court of Sikkim in the matter of "Prem Bahadur Rai
Vs State of Sikkim" reported at 1978 Cr.L.J. 945 and the judgment of
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter titled as "Arun Kumar vs State"
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter titled as "Sharad Birdhichand
Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra"reported at (1984) 4 SCC 116, has laid
down the following five golden principles constituting the panchsheel of the
proof of a case based on circumstantial evidence:
Section 120 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Dr. R. Palani Durai, Assistant ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By The Secretary ... on 17 March, 2003
It needs no emphasis that it has to be
established by the prosecution that death of Gurcharan Singh has actually
taken place like any other fact. What to say of recovery of dead body of
Gurcharan Singh, not even a piece of mortal remains of Gurcharan Singh was
found in this case. In this backdrop, the prosecution cannot be said to have
proved the guilt of accused persons. While saying so I am also fortified by
the judgment in the matter titled as "K.T Palam Samy Vs. State of
Tamilnadu" reported at 2008(1) RCR(Criminal) 870(SC).