Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.34 seconds)Uttam Singh Dugal & Co.Ltd vs Unied Bank Of India & Ors on 8 August, 2000
9. A long line of authorities- starting with Uttam Singh Duggal & Co.
Vs United Bank of India & Ors 2000 (7) SCC 120 - a judgment of the
Supreme Court, had enunciated the principle that for the grant of a decree
on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, the admission has to be
unequivocal or unambiguous and not one which is qualified.
M/S Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd vs M/S Jasbir Singh Chadha (Huf) & Anr on 7 May, 2010
M/s
Jeevan Diesels (supra) held also, as follows:
Karam Kapahi & Ors vs M/S Lal Chand Public Charitabl ... on 7 April, 2010
"Whether or not there is a clear, unambiguous admission
by one party of the case of the other party is essentially a
question of fact and the decision of this question depends
on the facts of the case. This question, namely whether
there is a clear admission or not cannot be decided on
the basis of a judicial precedent. Therefore, even though
the principles in KaramKapahi (supra) may be
unexceptionable they cannot be applied in the instant
case in view of a totally different fact situation."
Charanjit Lal Mehra & Ors vs Smt.Kamal Saroj Mahajan&Anr on 11 March, 2005
The provision is undoubtedly wide in its import and
that admissions may be inferred from the facts and circumstances of the
case; Charanjit Lal Mehra and others v. Kamal Saroj Mahajan (Smt.) and
Another (2005) 11 SCC 279 is an authority for this proposition.
1