Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)Arun Prakash Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 31 March, 2016
8. Shri Mangal, learned Government Advocate for the appellant
submits that the judgment passed in case of Arun Prakash Yadav
(Supra) requires reconsideration as the scope of Regulation 229 has not
been considered by the Division Bench where the Superintendent is
empowered to pass the final order in certain cases and in other cases
file would be sent to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, therefore,
the Regulation 228 and 229 has to be read together and according to
which, the Superintendent of Police alone is not competent to issue the
charge-sheet, but Deputy Inspector General of Police can also issue a
charge-sheet to the Inspector.
Bhakra Beas Management Board vs Krishan Kumar Vij & Anr on 19 August, 2010
In support
of his plea, he has placed reliance over the judgment passed in case of
Bhakra Beas Management Board Vs. Krishan Kumar Vij and Anr.,
reported in (2010) 8 SCC 701, therefore, this Court can reconsider the
issue decided in the case of Arun Prakash Yadav (Supra).
R.K. Richhariya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 April, 2023
34. From the above conspectus of facts and law, it is evident
that neither in the case of N.K. Pandey (supra) nor in the
case of Dalchand Ahirwar (supra) the question of
applicability or non-applicability of the Rules of 1966 was
raised or considered by this Court for deciding the question
of competence of the authority to initiate disciplinary
proceedings against an Inspector of Police. Moreso, this
Court in both these contrary decisions was not posed with,
and, therefore, did not consider, the question as to whether
mere declaration of the post of Inspector as Gazetted can
induct by implication the post of Inspector into the Gazetted
service constituted under the Gazetted Rules, without the
said Rules being amended.
Ande Jagadeesh vs Imam Shukla on 15 April, 2020
In support of his contention, he has
placed reliance over the judgment of this Court in case of State of M.P.
Vs. Virendra Singh Gurjar, reported in 2015, SCC Online MP 5850 , in
case of Shyambaboo Vs. State of M.P. , reported in 1987(2) MPWN 43
and in case of State of M.P. Vs. Shivaji Rao, reported in 1990(2),
MPWN 172.
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Mahesh Kumar Bhargave on 18 April, 2016
12. Though the writ Court has allowed the writ petition placing reliance
over the judgment passed in Naresh Kumar Suryavanshi (Supra) and
set-aside the chargesheet, but in case of Arun Prakash Yadav (Supra) ,
the Division Bench on a reference has specifically held that the
Superintendent of Police alone has been mentioned as authority to
frame and issue the charge-sheet in respect of penalty or penalties.
State Of M.P. vs Virendra Singh Gurjar(V.S Gurjar) on 7 August, 2014
In support of his contention, he has
placed reliance over the judgment of this Court in case of State of M.P.
Vs. Virendra Singh Gurjar, reported in 2015, SCC Online MP 5850 , in
case of Shyambaboo Vs. State of M.P. , reported in 1987(2) MPWN 43
and in case of State of M.P. Vs. Shivaji Rao, reported in 1990(2),
MPWN 172.
1