Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs T. Adinarayan Setty on 7 November, 1958
"This court had in Special Land Acquisition Officer v. T. Adinarayan Shetty [1959] Supp. 1 SCR. 404,412; AIR 1959 SC 429, 432, indicated the methods of valuation to be adopted in ascertaining the market value of the land on the date of the notification under Section 4(1), which are:
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Tribeni Devi And Ors vs Collector Of Ranchi on 25 January, 1972
In Smt. Tribeni Devi v. Collector, Ranchi AIR 1972 SC 1417, 1420, which case also arose under the Land Acquisition Act, the Supreme Court has observed as follows :
Controller Of Estate Duty, West Bengal vs Radha Devi Jalan. on 24 May, 1967
11. In the instant case, the Tribunal has held after considering the facts and circumstances of the case that gross rental value should be adopted as fair. The Tribunal could have adopted one or more methods for estimating the value. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal found that the gross rental value was the proper method to be applied in the instant case to ascertain the market value under Section 36 of the Estate Duty Act. That being the position, it cannot be said that the Tribunal committed any error of law in directing the house property in question to be valued on the rental method in preference to the other methods, such as, the land and building method. The reasonings behind the order of the Tribunal appear to be that, in the instant case, the Urban Areas Rent Control Act is applicable, and under that Act maximum lent is fixed and the grounds of eviction of the tenants are also laid down tinder that Act, and by the impact of the Urban Areas Rent Control Act ready purchasers of the house property may not be available and thus it would not be just and fair to determine the market value on the land and building method. These considerations are evident in the order of the Tribunal, when it has referred to the Rent Control Acts and the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Controller of Estate Duty v. Radha Devi Jalan [1968] 67 ITR 761 (Cal).
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
1