Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.40 seconds)Section 234C in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I vs Moon Star Develpers....Opponent(S) on 5 March, 2014
22.1. The only effective ground raised in this Revenue's appeal is
against in allowing deduction of Rs.79,21,904/- u/s.80IB(10) r.w.s.
80IB(1) to assessee on profit derived from sale of unutilized FSI. Since
this issue has been restored back to the file of AO for verification and
decision afresh in the light of the judgement of Hon'ble Gujarat High
Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Moon Star Developers in Tax
Appeal No.549 of 2008, therefore taking a consistent view in this year
also, this ground of Revenue's appeal is restored back to the file of AO
for verification and decision afresh. Thus, this ground of Revenue's
appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Section 234A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Income Tax-I vs Chd Developers Ltd. on 22 January, 2014
), judgement of the Hon'ble Delhi High
Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. CHD Developers Ltd. (2014)
reported at 362 ITR 177 (Delhi) and decision of the Coordinate Bench
rendered in the case of Saket Corporation vs. ITO in ITA
No.3377/Ahd/2010 for AY 2007-08 dated 14/08/2014 .
Section 234D in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Saket Corporation, Baroda vs Department Of Income Tax on 20 March, 2012
), judgement of the Hon'ble Delhi High
Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. CHD Developers Ltd. (2014)
reported at 362 ITR 177 (Delhi) and decision of the Coordinate Bench
rendered in the case of Saket Corporation vs. ITO in ITA
No.3377/Ahd/2010 for AY 2007-08 dated 14/08/2014 .
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Commissioner Of Income Tax I vs Shreenath ... on 1 April, 2014
The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of
CIT vs. Shreenath Infrastructure has followed the judgement of Hon'ble
Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Moon Star Developers (Tax
Appeal No.549) and has reproduced the observation of the Hon'ble High
Court in para-3 of their judgement as under:-