Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.40 seconds)State Of H.P. vs Lashkari Ram on 9 May, 2007
12.2 Para:10 of the said judgment reads as under.
Section 14 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan vs Vimlaben Natubhai Sharma & on 22 July, 2013
13.2 Reference also needs to be made to the decisions of this
Court in the case of (i) Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan vs.
Vimlaben Natubhai Sharma recorded on Special Civil
Application No.6683 of 2013 dated 26.04.2013 and (ii)
Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan vs. Subhashbhai Khodabhai
Solanki recorded on Special Civil Application No.8744 of 2013
dated 03.07.2013 and 25.07.2013.
Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan vs Subhashbhai Khodabhai on 25 July, 2013
13.2 Reference also needs to be made to the decisions of this
Court in the case of (i) Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan vs.
Vimlaben Natubhai Sharma recorded on Special Civil
Application No.6683 of 2013 dated 26.04.2013 and (ii)
Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan vs. Subhashbhai Khodabhai
Solanki recorded on Special Civil Application No.8744 of 2013
dated 03.07.2013 and 25.07.2013.
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Ahmedabad Pvt. Primary Teachers' ... vs Administrative Officer And Ors on 13 January, 2004
11. If the above quoted provisions of the Payment of Gratuity
Act, 1972 and the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002
are conjointly and harmoniously read and applied in the facts
of the present case, while keeping in view the observations of
Honourable the Supreme Court of India in the case of
Ahmedabad Pvt. Primary Teachers' Association (supra), the
picture which has emerged before this Court is as under.
H. Gangahanume Gowda vs Karnataka Agro Industries Corpn.Ltd on 5 February, 2003
12.4 The view taken by this Court in the present case is
further fortified by the above decision.
1