Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.29 seconds)Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Bhim Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc. vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 24 September, 2003
38. Reliance on the earlier judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in
Bhim Singh's case (supra) dealing with the acquisition of land of village
Wazirabad vide notification dated 16.4.1990, whereby the value was determined at
212/- per square yard also has no relevance in the present case considering the fact
that the land owners have been able to produce not an isolated sale deed showing
substantial increase in the value of land in the area during the intervening period,
but large number of sale deeds registered even during the period of one year prior
to the issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act consistently showing
similar price. In the light of aforesaid evidence, the standard principle of awarding
increase @ 12% per annum cannot be made applicable in the facts and
circumstances of the present case.
Amar Nath And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 29 July, 1977
23. It is pertinent to mention here that evidence before the learned court
below was led primarily in LAC Nos. 70--Dalip v. State of Haryana and others,
497-Mahipal v. State of Haryana and others, 728 of 2000--Raghbir Singh v. State
of Haryana and others, and 920 of 2000--Amar Nath v. State of Haryana and
R.F.A. No. 1824 of 2006 [9]
others.
Dalip Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana on 28 April, 1993
23. It is pertinent to mention here that evidence before the learned court
below was led primarily in LAC Nos. 70--Dalip v. State of Haryana and others,
497-Mahipal v. State of Haryana and others, 728 of 2000--Raghbir Singh v. State
of Haryana and others, and 920 of 2000--Amar Nath v. State of Haryana and
R.F.A. No. 1824 of 2006 [9]
others.
Raghbir Singh & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 12 November, 2008
23. It is pertinent to mention here that evidence before the learned court
below was led primarily in LAC Nos. 70--Dalip v. State of Haryana and others,
497-Mahipal v. State of Haryana and others, 728 of 2000--Raghbir Singh v. State
of Haryana and others, and 920 of 2000--Amar Nath v. State of Haryana and
R.F.A. No. 1824 of 2006 [9]
others.
Mahipal vs State Of Haryana on 9 February, 2010
23. It is pertinent to mention here that evidence before the learned court
below was led primarily in LAC Nos. 70--Dalip v. State of Haryana and others,
497-Mahipal v. State of Haryana and others, 728 of 2000--Raghbir Singh v. State
of Haryana and others, and 920 of 2000--Amar Nath v. State of Haryana and
R.F.A. No. 1824 of 2006 [9]
others.
1