Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.89 seconds)Section 394 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Charan Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab on 26 July, 1974
In Charan Singh vs. State reported in 1998 Crl. L.J.
NOC 28 (Delhi) it was held that in order to bring home a
charge under Section 397, the prosecution must produce
convincing evidence that the knife used by the accused was
deadly weapon. What would make knife deadly is its design or
the method of its use such as is calculated to or is likely to
produce death. It is, therefore, a question of fact which is
required to be proved by the prosecution that the knife used by
the appellant was a deadly weapon and in absence of such
evidence and particularly non-recovery of the weapon, would
certainly bring the case out of the ambit of Section 397.
Section 428 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Rakesh Kumar Mishra vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 3 January, 2006
Similar
view has been expressed in Rakesh Kumar vs. State reported
in 2005(1) JCC 334.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1