Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (1.45 seconds)
Indu Munshi And Ors. vs Uoi And Ors. on 23 May, 2018 cites

State Of Punjab & Anr vs Surjit Singh & Ors on 4 August, 2009

(i) It is apparent, that this Court in State of Punjab v. Surjit Singh (2009) 9 SCC 514, did hold, that the determination rendered in paragraph 55 of the judgment in the Secretary, State of Karnataka case (2006) 4 SCC 1, was in exercise of the power vested in this Court, Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. But the above observation does not lead, to the conclusion or the inference, that the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' is not applicable to temporary employees. In fact, there is a positive take-away for the temporary employees. The Constitution Bench would, in the above situation, be deemed to have concluded, that to do complete justice to the cause of temporary employees, they should be paid the minimum wage of a regular employee, discharging the same duties.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 332 - S B Sinha - Full Document

State Of Haryana & Ors vs Charanjit Singh & Ors., Etc. Etc on 5 October, 2005

38. We, therefore, are of the opinion that the interest of justice would be subserved if the State is directed to examine the cases of the Respondents herein by appointing an expert committee as to whether the principles of law laid down herein viz. as to whether the Respondents satisfy the factors for invocation of the decision in State of Haryana v. Charanjit Singh (2006) 9 SCC 321 in its entirety including the question of appointment in terms of the recruitment Rules have been followed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 386 - S N Variava - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next