Additional Secretary, Chhattisgarh ... vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... on 19 March, 2014
7. Shri R.K. Bhawnani, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent (complainant) has argued that according to the Agreement
// 7 //
(Consent Letter) executed between both the parties, the premium of the
Group Personal Accidental Insurance policy, was paid by the
respondent (complainant) to the appellant (O.P.). The policy is a non-
contributory policy (xSj v'aknk;h), therefore, the legal heirs of the
deceased, are not necessary party in the complaint. The Agreement
(Consent Letter) has been executed between the appellant (O.P.) and
respondent (complainant), in which it is mentioned that if any accident
is occurred and any employee of the respondent (complainant) is died
in the accident, then the appellant (O.P.) will pay the insured amount to
the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent (complainant), therefore, the
impugned order passed by the District Forum, is just, proper and does
not suffer from any jurisdictional error, irregularity or illegality and
does not call for any interference of this Commission, hence the appeal
of the appellant (O.P.), is liable to be dismissed. He placed reliance on
judgment of Hon'ble National Commission in Revision Petition
No.2139 of 2011 - Additional Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Power
Holding Company Limited vs. Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company
Limited decided on 19.03.2014.