Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)Smt. Vithabai G. Ghodake And Anr. vs The United Western Bank Limited And Ors. on 29 January, 2003
(iii) the decision of this court in the case
of SMT. VITHABAI G.GHODAKE
AND ANOTHER V. THE UNITED
WESTERN BANK LIMITED, BY
BRANCH MANAGER, DHARWAD
AND OTHERS, ILR 2003 KAR 1306,
cited by the respondents to treat
postal shara "unclaimed" as refusal to
accept service, is bit difficult to
accept; the said decision was
rendered holding service as sufficient
inasmuch as apart from postal shara
'not claimed', the notice sent by
RPAD had been duly served unlike in
the present case; these facts are
stated at para 7 of the decision;
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mirza Mohammed Yousuf Baig vs Deccan Enterprises on 12 February, 1996
therefore, the invocation of suppresio
veri by banking upon the decision of
this court in the case of MIRZA
MOHAMMED YOUSUF BAIG V.
M/S. DECCAN ENTERPRISES, ILR
1996 KAR 1618 is not well founded
for the purpose of non-suiting the
petitioner; for the same reason, the
Apex Court decision in the case of
KISHORE SAMRITE VS STATE OF
U.P. & ORS, (2013) 2 SCC 398,
cannot be pressed into service;
1