Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)N.P. Lalan vs V.A. John on 19 August, 1971
In view of the proviso to Section 30, following the ratio laid down in the above decision, there is no difficulty in holding that there is no substantial question of law in this appeal and hence this Court ought not to interfere with the award of compensation by the Commissioner. I have no hesitation in holding that the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
Section 4 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Proprietor, Swarnambiga Motor ... vs M. Muthuswami on 27 April, 1959
In this connection, the learned Counsel for the respondent drew the attention of this Court to the decision in Proprietor, Swarnambiga Motor Service v. M. Muthuswami (1959) 3 MLJ Criminal 802, wherein it was specifically held that the jurisdiction to decide the loss of earning capacity of an injured workman is with the Commissioner and that medical evidence being only opinion evidence would not be decisive of the question and that the Commissioner had to independently give a finding as to the extent of the loss of earning capacity.
1