Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.54 seconds)Mrs Saraswathi Seshagiri vs State Of Kerala And Anr. on 26 March, 1982
3. There cannot be any doubt that the satisfaction of the detaining authority is a subjective one and if the same is properly arrived at Courts have hardly any jurisdiction to interfere with the same. It is also equally clear that even a single incident may be of such a magnitude that it would reasonably give rise to a bona fide satisfaction in the mind of the detaining authority that such incidents were likely to be repeated in the same manner and those who are alleged to have taken part in such incident had to be detained in order that the tempo of peace in public life is not jeopardised. See Narayan Debnath v. State of West Bengal and Mrs. Saraswathi; Seshagiri v. State of Kerala .
Ramveer Jatav vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 29 October, 1986
Applying the test laid down in Fazal Ghosi's case and Ramveer Jatav's case , referred to supra, we are clearly of the opinion that there has been no reference to any other material in the grounds of detention or the order of detention to form the basis of the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority that the detenus would repeat the misconduct or would do something else which would be prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order and since that is the pre-requisite for passing an order under Section 3 of the Act, and the said prerequisite is found to be absent, the detention , must be held to be illegal.
The National Security Act, 1980
1