Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)
Farhad Banu vs State & Ors on 8 December, 2017 cites

Sher Singh And Ors vs Dinesh Singh And Ors on 27 April, 2017

22. Admittedly, the aforesaid judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Sher Singh & Ors. Vs. Dinesh Singh & Ors. (supra), called for a fresh notification/advertisement which was also issued on the common date for TSP and Non-TSP Areas, thus taking ahead the selection process requiring filling of fresh application form or updation of the information on or before 11.10.2017. Until 11.10.2017, the complete exercise for TSP and Non-TSP Areas may be with different advertisement for the same post for whole of the State of Rajasthan was being conducted simultaneously. A strange discrimination has however crept into by the respondents, whereby they have on the one hand have given liberal relaxation to the candidates belonging to the Non-TSP Area by allowing them to fill their fresh application form and updating their information until 15.12.2017, whereas the same benefit has been denied to the candidates belonging to the TSP Area. Thus, the candidates of TSP Area, who are more backward and obviously having less connectivity of media and meagre informative resources ought to have been given at least same treatment as was extended for the purpose of Non-TSP Area, which is of 65 days.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 12 - Cited by 22 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

Charles. K. Skaria vs Dr.C.Mathew on 19 March, 1980

8. This principle was explained and applied in Charles K. Skaria and Ors. v. Dr. C. Mathew and Ors. The controversy here related to admission to a post graduate course in medicine. The relevant rule provided for addition of 10% marks if a candidate possessed a diploma in the relevant subject or sub- specialty and this benefit could be given only if the candidate's success in the diploma course was brought to the knowledge of the Selection Committee before completion of selection in an authentic or acceptable manner. The Prospectus provided that the attested copies of statement of marks and other documents should be attached with every application. Three such candidates were given admission who had not attached the certificate of having passed the diploma along with their applications. Their admission to post graduate course was set aside by the High Court on the ground that their applications, wherein they claimed (12 of 23) [CW-13986/2017] the benefit of diploma, were liable to be rejected as the requisite certificates had not been attached. This Court speaking through Krishna Iyer, J. reversed the judgment of the High Court and held that the admission to the candidates had rightly been given as they had in fact passed the diploma before the date fixed. The relevant parts of paras 20 and 24 of the judgment, where this principle was highlighted are being reproduced below :
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 230 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1