Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
In Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commr., reported in 1978 (1) SCC 405, and at Paragraph 8, the Apex Court held as follows:
Commissioner Of Police, Bombay vs Gordhandas Bhanji on 23 November, 1951
"8. The second equally relevant matter is that when a statutory functionary makes an order based on certain grounds, it validity must be judged by the reasons so mentioned and cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons in the shape of affidavit or otherwise. Otherwise, an order bad in the beginning may, by the time it comes to Court on account of a challenge, get validated by additional grounds later brought out. We may here draw attention to the observations of Bose, J. in Commr., of Police, Bombay v. Gordhandas Bhanji, reported in AIR 1952 SC 16:
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd vs Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors on 20 September, 2005
6. The above position of law has been restated in Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd., v. Darius Shapur Chenai reported in 2005 (7) SCC 627, and at Paragraph 24 of the judgment, the Supreme Court held as follows:
N.Sivakumaran vs )The State Of Tamilnadu on 12 September, 2008
10. As regards the manner in which the appellate authority has to consider the statutory appeal, this Court, after considering a catena of decisions, in N.Sivakumaran v. State of T.N., reported in 2009 (1) MLJ 701, has held as follows:
1