Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.01 seconds)
The State Of Rajasthan vs Shankar Lal S/O Late Shri Heera Lal on 7 October, 2023 cites

Union Of India vs Tarsem Singh on 19 September, 2019

17. Therefore, taking cognizance of the established delay on part of respondent no.1 in raising his grievance and the said aspect subsequently missing the considered attention of the learned Single Judge, this Court, without going into the merits of the case but solely on account of delay and laches and having relied upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex as enunciated in Rushibhai Jagdish Chandra Pathak (Supra) and Tarsem Singh (Supra), deems it appropriate to allow the present appeal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 80 - Cited by 3438 - R F Nariman - Full Document

State & Ors vs Devendra Kumar & Ors on 7 December, 2010

1. In the present batch of appeals, the scope of the controversy involved is identical. Therefore, considering the fact that the appeals warrant adjudication on common question(s) of law, with consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the parties, D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1055/2022 titled as The State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Anil Kumar and Ors., is being taken up as the lead case.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 5 - Cited by 368 - A Mishra - Full Document

Balkrishna Savalram Pujari And Others vs Shree Dnyaneshwar Maharajsansthan & ... on 26 March, 1959

In Tarsem Singh (supra), reference was also made to Section 22 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the following passage from Balkrishna Savalram Pujari Waghmare and Others v. Shree Dhyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan and Others, which had explained the concept of continuing wrong in the context of Section 23 of the Limitation Act, 1908, corresponding to Section 22 of the Limitation Act, 1963 observing that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 113 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Rushibhai Jagdishchandra Pathak vs Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation on 18 May, 2022

17. Therefore, taking cognizance of the established delay on part of respondent no.1 in raising his grievance and the said aspect subsequently missing the considered attention of the learned Single Judge, this Court, without going into the merits of the case but solely on account of delay and laches and having relied upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex as enunciated in Rushibhai Jagdish Chandra Pathak (Supra) and Tarsem Singh (Supra), deems it appropriate to allow the present appeal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 67 - A Rastogi - Full Document
1   2 Next