Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
Absogain Retail Solutions vs Puma Se on 15 May, 2023 cites

Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd vs Sanjay Dalia & Anr on 1 July, 2015

3. He further stated that the Trial Court had failed to appreciate that it had no territorial jurisdiction to try and decide the subject-suit. He submitted that the finding of the Trial Court on the issue of territorial jurisdiction was Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:16.05.2023 11:40:00 RFA(COMM) 39/2023 Page 2 of 11 Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:3369-DB contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court of India in Indian Performing Rights Society Vs Sanjay Dalia & Anr, [2015] 10 SCC 161. He emphasised that the witness of the respondent-plaintiff [PW-1] had deposed that, "I have no proof and I do not say that defendant was also selling his goods in offline market." the witness further stated that, "I do not have any proof that defendant has ever sold infringed goods in Delhi".
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 157 - A Mishra - Full Document

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. And ... vs Siti Cable Network Ltd. on 30 March, 2001

12. He contended that the above statement if examined in the context of the judgment of this Court in Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. And Ors. Vs. Siti Cable Network Ltd., 2001 SCC OnLine Del 359, would clearly show that there was no bar on a non-advocate accepting a POA and specially when Mr.Rakesh Chhabra had not appeared in this case as a pleader/advocate.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 9 - A Kumar - Full Document
1