Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.26 seconds)Government of India Act, 1935
Section 30 in Income Tax Rules, 1962 [Entire Act]
Income Tax Rules, 1962
Section 3 in Income Tax Rules, 1962 [Entire Act]
Article 372 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Central Excise Act, 1944
The Rajasthan Finance Act, 1990
Section 60 in Income Tax Rules, 1962 [Entire Act]
Ameer-Un-Nissa Begum & Ors vs Mahboob Begum & Ors on 14 January, 1955
For example, in Ameer-un-nissa's case, (1) the Firmam set
aside the decision of a Special Commission in respect of
certain claimants and though a subsequent Firman revoked the
earlier Firman, it did not restore the decision of the
Special 'Commission. It was in these circumstances that
this court observed
"The determination of all these questions
depends primarily upon the meaning and effect
to be gives to the various' 'Firmans" of the,
Nizam which we have set out already. .'It
cannot be disputed that prior to the
integration of Hyderabad State with the Indian
Union and the coming to force of the Indian
Constitution, the Nizam of Hyderabad enjoyed
uncontrolled sovereign powers. He was the
supreme legislature, the supreme judiciary and
the supreme head of the executive, and there
were no constitutional limitations upon his
authority to act in any of these capacities.
The 'Firmans' were: expressions of the
sovereign will of the Nizam and they were
binding in the same way as any other
law;...nay, they would. Override all other
laws which were in conflict. with them. So
long as' a particular 'Firman' 'held the
field" that alone would govern or regulate
the. fights of the parties concerned, though
it could 'be annulled or
(1) A.I.R. (1955) S.C. 352,(2) A.I.R. (1956) S. 60;