Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.39 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Bir Singh vs Mukesh Kumar on 6 February, 2019
In Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar, after discussing the settled
line of precedent of this Court on this issue, a two-Judge Bench
held:
Msr Leathers vs S. Palaniappan And Anr on 26 September, 2012
18. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's larger Bench in MSR Leathers v. S.
Palaniappan reported in (2013) 1 SCC 177, cited by the learned counsel for the
complainant, held that prosecution based on a cause of action arising from
subsequent dishonour is permissible. Having produced the banker's memo for
the subsequent dishonour, the complainant's case is not affected by non-
production of the first dishonour memo. The observation of the learned
Magistrate that the complaint and documents don't match lacks elaboration.
T. Nagappa vs Y.R. Muralidhar on 24 April, 2008
9. The learned Counsel for the revision
petitioner/accused has relied on the decision of the Division
Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in T.Nagappa Vs.
Y.R.Muralidhar reported in 2008(2) Crimes 219 (SC) and the
relevant passages are extracted hereunder:
Oriental Bank Of Commerce vs Prabodh Kumar Tewari on 16 August, 2022
10. At this juncture, it is necessary to refer the recent
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Oriental Bank Of
Commerce vs Prabodh Kumar Tewari reported in 2022 Live law
SC 714, wherein it has been held as follows:
M/S Kalamani Tex vs P. Balasubramanian on 10 February, 2021
In that decision, another judgment of the Three
Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kalamani Tex
Vs. Balasubramanian reported in 2021(5) SCC 283 was
referred and wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has reiterated the
legal position settled in Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh Kumar reported
in (2019)4 SCC 197, wherein it has been held as follows: