Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)
National Insurance Company Limited vs Harpreet Singh on 18 September, 2023 cites

New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Harpreet Sing, Minor Son Of Ajaib ... on 20 December, 2002

13. Moreover, the appellant has not mentioned the date when they have applied for certified copy. A perusal of record reveals that the District Forum has dispatched the copy of impugned order vide diary no. 229-230 dated 16.05.2023. Copy of impugned order was dispatched vide consignment no. ED29238021IN by the District Forum in envelop and received by the appellant on 19.05.2023 as per envelope filed on page 22. Further, the appellant has averred in para 3 of the application that they have received the copy on 23.05.2023. Even if we consider that the appellant has received the copy of the impugned order on 23.05.2023, in this circumstance also, the appellant was expected to file the appeal within the limitation period i.e. by 22.06.2023. Thus, still there is unexplained delay of 43 days in filing the appeal for which sufficient/cogent reasons have not been given. Even the date of DISMISSED Page 5 of 7 FA/384/2023 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. VS. MR. HARPREET SINGH DOD: 18.09.2023 Lok Adalat in May 2023 has not been mentioned. As per our information, it was held on 13.05.2023. It is not even mentioned as to the specific date file was traced and by whom. Name of the official/officer who traced the file has been withheld and his/her affidavit has also not been filed.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Basawaraj By Lrs Ors vs Spl.Land Acquisition Officer on 11 April, 2011

8. In order to condone the delay, the Appellant has to satisfy this Commission that there was sufficient cause for preferring the appeal after the stipulated period. The term 'sufficient cause' has been explained by the Apex Court in Basawaraj and Ors. vs. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer reported in AIR 2014 SC 746. The relevant paras of the aforesaid judgment are reproduced as under:-
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 315 - Full Document

Office Of The Chief Post Master & Ors vs Living Media India Ltd.& Anr on 24 February, 2012

15. Additionally, the Appellant's sole justification in the aforementioned application was that the delay in filing the Appeal is Procedural delay. To this argument of the Appellant, we deem it appropriate to refer to the case of Office of The Chief Post Master General and Ors. Vs. Living Media India Ltd. and Ors. reported in AIR 2012 SC 1506, wherein the apex court has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 1704 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1