Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.47 seconds)The Right to Information Act, 2005
Article 58 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 20 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Head Constable Dharam Pal vs The Commissioner Of Police on 23 April, 2012
―....filing of representations alone would not save
the period of limitation. Delay or laches is a
relevant factor for a court of law to determine the
question as to whether the claim made by an
applicant deserves consideration. Delay and/or
laches on the part of a government servant may
deprive him of the benefit which had been given to
others. Article 14 of the Constitution of India
would not, in a situation of that nature, be
attracted as it is well known that law leans in
favour of those who are alert and vigilant.‖
8.2 In the light of the above said legal position of the
various High Courts, especially in the case of Hariom (supra),
and Apex Court as also having regard to the provisions of the
Act ibid, it is clear that in order to get the benefit of limitation,
the application has to satisfy this Tribunal that he was
16
diligently pursuing his matter and was prevented by sufficient
cause for not filing the OA within the period of limitation.
State Of U.P.& Ors vs Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors on 17 October, 2014
(d) ―In A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. v. State of Kerala
and others, (2007) 2 SCC 725 following the earlier judgment
in U. P. Jal Nigam's case, it was opined as under:
D.C.S. Negi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 11 April, 2008
(a) The Hon'ble Apex Court in D.C.S. Negi v. Union of
India & others (Civil Appeal No.7956 of 2011) decided on
7.3.2011, condemned entertaining of the OAs by the Tribunal
in disregard of the limitation prescribed under Section 21 of
the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985. In the said order,
following observations were made:
S.S. Rathore vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 September, 1989
(b) The Apex Court in the case of S.S. Rathore v. State of
Madhya Pradesh, (1989) 4 SCC 582. In the said case, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court has held thus:-
Chennai Metropolitan Water ... vs T.T. Murali Babu on 10 February, 2014
(c) In Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and
Sewerage Board & Ors. Vs. T.T. Murali Babu, (2014) 4
SCC 108, the Apex Court has been ruled thus: