Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)

Shri Banarsi Dass vs Mrs. Teeku Dutta And Anr on 27 April, 2005

9. It was held by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as Banarsi Dass V. Teeku Dutta and Another (2005 (4) SCC 449) that "The main object of a Succession Certificate is to facilitate collection of debts on succession and afford protection to parties paying debts to representatives of deceased persons. All that the Succession Certificate purports to do is to facilitate the collection of debts, to regulate the administration of succession and to protect persons who deal with the alleged representatives of the deceased persons. Such a certificate does not give any general power of administration on the estate of the deceased. The grant of a certificate does not establish title of the grantee as the heir of SC No.27/10 Page 6 of 10 the deceased. A succession certificate is intended as noted above to protect the debtors, which means that where a debtor of a deceased person either voluntarily pays his debt to a person holding a certificate under the Act, or is compelled by the decree of a Court to pay it to the person, he is lawfully discharged. The grant of a certificate does not establish a title of the grantee as the heir of the deceased, but only furnishes him with authority to collect his debts and allows the debtors to make payments to him without incurring any risk. In order to succeed in the succession application the applicant has to adduce cogent and credible evidence in support of the application. The respondents, if they so chooses, can also adduce evidence to oppose grant of succession certificate."
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 96 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1