Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.21 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Section 29 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Molly Joseph @ Nish vs George Sebastian @ Joy on 18 September, 1996
This is so in view of the
unequivocal pronouncement in Mary Roy v. State of Kerala
[AIR 1986 SC 1011] and Molly Joseph v. George Sebastian
[1997 (1) KLT 1 (SC)] on the point.
Mrs. Mary Roy Etc. Etc vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 24 February, 1986
This is so in view of the
unequivocal pronouncement in Mary Roy v. State of Kerala
[AIR 1986 SC 1011] and Molly Joseph v. George Sebastian
[1997 (1) KLT 1 (SC)] on the point.
Mother Superior, Adoration Convent vs D.E.O. And Ors. on 28 February, 1976
Oriental Insurance Company v.
Mother Superior [1994 (1) KLT 868 (DB)] and Varghese v.
Krishnan Nair [2004 (2) KLT 783 (DB)] follows Mother Superior
(supra) and nothing more. We have no hesitation to hold that
the above decisions of the Division Bench on the right of a
Christian priest or nun over his/her personal property are no
longer good law and binding.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Mother Superior, S.H. Convent And Ors. on 7 April, 1994
Oriental Insurance Company v.
Mother Superior [1994 (1) KLT 868 (DB)] and Varghese v.
Krishnan Nair [2004 (2) KLT 783 (DB)] follows Mother Superior
(supra) and nothing more. We have no hesitation to hold that
the above decisions of the Division Bench on the right of a
Christian priest or nun over his/her personal property are no
longer good law and binding.
Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan & Ors vs Moran Mar Marthoma & Anr on 20 June, 1995
6. The Canon Law is after all a body of principles,
standards, rules or norms internal to the church distinguished
from the civil law [See: Rev.P.M.A.Metropolitan v. Moran Mar
Marthoma (AIR 1995 SC 2001)]. The Canon Law can no longer
be treated as customary law after its codification by the
Vatican Council in the year 1918 as observed by
E.D.Devadason. The following extract from his book -
'Christian Law in India' is illuminating: