Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.40 seconds)

Mr. Subhash Chandra vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 9 July, 2009

Vs. Union of India and another etc.- A.I.R. 1996 Karnataka 282, Manita Kanaujia Vs. The State of Bihar and others- 1993 (2) PLJR 491, Subhash Chandra and another Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and others- (2009) 15 SCC 458, State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Kumari Tanuja- A.I.R. 1999 SC 791, E.V. Chinnaiah Vs. State of A.P. and others- (2005) 1 SCC 394, Ashok Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India and others- (2008) 6 SCC 1 and Payment of Wages Inspector, Ujjain Vs. Surajmal Mehta, Director, The Barnagar Electric Supply and Industrial Co. Ltd. and another- A.I.R. 1969 SC 590.
Central Information Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 136 - Full Document

E.V.Chinnaiah vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors on 5 November, 2004

Vs. Union of India and another etc.- A.I.R. 1996 Karnataka 282, Manita Kanaujia Vs. The State of Bihar and others- 1993 (2) PLJR 491, Subhash Chandra and another Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and others- (2009) 15 SCC 458, State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Kumari Tanuja- A.I.R. 1999 SC 791, E.V. Chinnaiah Vs. State of A.P. and others- (2005) 1 SCC 394, Ashok Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India and others- (2008) 6 SCC 1 and Payment of Wages Inspector, Ujjain Vs. Surajmal Mehta, Director, The Barnagar Electric Supply and Industrial Co. Ltd. and another- A.I.R. 1969 SC 590.
Supreme Court of India Cites 61 - Cited by 186 - Full Document

Payment Of Wages Inspector vs Surajmal Mehta & Anr on 3 December, 1968

Vs. Union of India and another etc.- A.I.R. 1996 Karnataka 282, Manita Kanaujia Vs. The State of Bihar and others- 1993 (2) PLJR 491, Subhash Chandra and another Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and others- (2009) 15 SCC 458, State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Kumari Tanuja- A.I.R. 1999 SC 791, E.V. Chinnaiah Vs. State of A.P. and others- (2005) 1 SCC 394, Ashok Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India and others- (2008) 6 SCC 1 and Payment of Wages Inspector, Ujjain Vs. Surajmal Mehta, Director, The Barnagar Electric Supply and Industrial Co. Ltd. and another- A.I.R. 1969 SC 590.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 27 - J M Shelat - Full Document

Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. Etc. on 16 November, 1992

Referring to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Indra Sawhney Vs. Union of India- 1992 Supp (3) SCC 217 and various other cases as indicated hereinabove the only submission that was canvassed before us is that the impugned order/circular (Annexure-1) has the effect of removing the caste in question from the list of Most Backward Class and including it in a Scheduled Caste Category which is beyond the powers available to the State Government and as it could be done only by issuing a notification under Clause (1) of Article 342 of the Constitution by the Central Government after amendment in the Presidential Scheduled Caste Order of 1950.
Supreme Court of India Cites 136 - Cited by 1429 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Kishori Das & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 4 February, 2017

7. That apart certain challenge was tried to be made to the recommendation made by the Commission for deleting all these castes from the list of highly Backward Class. A Coordinate Bench of this Court while deciding C.W.J.C. No. 9215 of 2015 (Kishori Das and others Vs. The State of Bihar and others) on 04.02.2017 has held that the report of the State Backward Classes Commission being based on deliberations held after due research and inquiry and if it is accepted by the State Government a Writ Court cannot sit over the said recommendation of the Committee and deal with the report as if it is exercising appellate jurisdiction over the decision arrived at by an expert Commission after due consideration. It has been held by the Division Bench that this Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere with the findings of such Statutory Committee and rejected a plea made for holding the recommendation of the Committee to be illegal.
Patna High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 6 - H Gupta - Full Document
1   2 Next