Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)Section 91 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Sikkim vs Sri Thukchuk Lachungpa And Anr. on 26 July, 2004
Criminal Revision No. 393/2024
Ved Prakash Vs. State (GNCT of Delhi) Page 3 of 16
b. Hon'ble High Court of Sikkim in Crl. Rev. No.
3/2004 titled as State of Sikkim Vs. Sri Thukchuk
Lachungpa and Anr., has observed that :
S.K. Mahajan And Etc. vs Municipality on 29 July, 1981
"17. xxxxxxx I am also of the view that the case laws
cited by Shri D. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, i.e.
the decision of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court
rendered in S. K. Mahajan Vs. Municipality, Jammu (supra)
does not help the case of the accused-respondents as the
right of the prosecution to examine a vital witness
mentioned above has been deprived of by and under the
impugned order.
U.T. Of Dadra & Haveli & Anr vs Fatehsinh Mohansinh Chauhan on 14 August, 2006
c. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as U.
T. Dadra & Haveli & Anr. Vs. Fatehsinh Mohansinh
Chauhan reported in 2006 AIR SCW 4840, has observed
that :
P.Sanjeeva Rao vs State Of A.P on 2 July, 2012
d. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled P.
Sanjeeva Rao Vs. State of A.P. reported in AIR 2012
SUPREME COURT 2242, has observed that :
Mohanlal Shamji Soni vs Union Of India And Another on 22 February, 1991
"14. The extent and the scope of the power of the
Court to recall witnesses was examined by this Court
in Mohan Shamji Soni Vs. Union of India & Anr.;1991
Supp (1) 271, where this Court observed:
Maria Margadia Sequeria Fernandes & Ors vs Erasmo Jack De Sequeria (D) Tr.Lrs.& Ors on 21 March, 2012
15. Discovery of the truth is the essential purpose of
any trial or enquiry, observed a three-Judge Bench of
this Court in Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v.
Erasmo Jack de Sequeria through LRs. 2012 (3)
SCALE 550. A timely reminder of that solemn duty
was given, in the following words:
Natasha Singh vs Cbi (State) on 8 May, 2013
Criminal Revision No. 393/2024
Ved Prakash Vs. State (GNCT of Delhi) Page 6 of 16
e. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as
Natasha Singh Vs. CBI (State) reported in 2013 (5) SCC
741, has observed that :