Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 46 (0.61 seconds)
Bimal Kumar vs Sajogita Devi & Others on 17 September, 2024 cites

Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma vs Aribam Pishak Sharma And Ors. on 25 January, 1979

In Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma(supra), this Court was examining an order passed by the Judicial Commissioner who was reviewing an earlier judgment that went in favour of the appellant, while deciding a review application filed by the respondents therein who took a ground that the predecessor Court had overlooked two important documents that showed that the respondents were in possession of the sites through which ::: Downloaded on - 17/09/2024 20:32:38 :::CIS 24 Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:8659 ) the appellant had sought easementary rights to access his homestead. The said appeal was allowed by this Court with the following observations:
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 773 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Parsion Devi & Ors vs Sumitri Devi & Ors on 14 October, 1997

11. Another case, which may be briefly dealt with is the case of Parison Devi Vs. Sumitri Devi[(1997) 8 SCC 715], where, this Court ruled that under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, a judgment may be open to review inter alia if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of the record. An error which is not self-evident and has to be detected by a process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record justifying the Court to exercise its power of review. It also observed that a review petition cannot be allowed to be treated as an appeal in disguise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 1043 - S R Babu - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next