Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 13 in Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952
Section 14 in Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Smt. Chandan Bai vs Surjan on 20 December, 1971
It is apparent from the language of the section that while Section 3 of the U. P. No. III of 1947 merely lays down the requirements for filing a suit for eviction against a tenant, Section 13 of Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act provides that the Court must satisfy itself before passing a decree for
eviction whether one or more of the grounds mentioned in the section have been made out. The provisions of Section 13 of Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act are similar to the provisions of Sections 14 and 15 of U. P, Act No. III of 1947. Therefore, the observations made by the Supreme Court in the ruling cited cannot be applied to this case. The view taken by me was also taken by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Smt. Chandan Bai v. Surjan, AIR 1972 Madh Pra 106.
Kaushalya Devi & Ors vs Shri K.L. Bansal on 3 December, 1968
The attention of the Court was also drawn to the observations made by the Supreme Court in Smt. Kaushalya Devi v. K. L. Bansal, AIR 1970 SC 838.
Babu Kanhaya Lal vs His Highness The Maharaja Sri Prabhu ... on 30 January, 1924
4. The learned counsel for the judgment-debtor-appellant in support of this contention mainly placed reliance on the observations made by this Court in Kanhaiya Lal v. Umraro Singh, 1958 All LJ 640 and Ram Agyan Singh v. Murlidhar Agarwal,
1971 All LJ 79.
1