Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.25 seconds)Harbans Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 16 October, 1961
In
Harbans Singh & another v. State of Punjab AIR 1962 SC 439 this
Court held that it is neither a rule of law nor of prudence that dying
declaration requires to be corroborated by other evidence before a
conviction can be based thereon.
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Ram Sagar Yadav And Ors. on 22 January, 1985
Reference may also be made to
the decision of this Court in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ram Sagar
Yadav and others (1985) 1 SCC 552.
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Suresh Alias Chhavan And Ors. on 5 May, 1981
26. Thus, as per the proposition of law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid authority, there is no requirement for
the corroboration of the dying declaration before it is acted upon.
Sohan Lal vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 1 May, 2013
32. A Division Bench of this Court in case Surinder @
Sundri son of Sohan Lal Vs. State of Haryana 2014 (3) RCR (Crl.) 110
has laid down that the expression "fit to make statement" and "fit during
the statement" would include an opinion that the patient was fit in all
respects and in a fit state of mind to make a statement. So, there is no
escape from the conclusion that the deceased Inderpreet Kaur was fit in
all respect while make the dying declarations.
Krishan Lal Gera vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 4 July, 2011
40. There was absolutely no reason for the false implication of
the appellants by deceased Inderpreet Kaur. In the defence plea, it has
been alleged that the deceased was fed up with the bad habits of her
husband and their weak financial position. It is also alleged that the
SUNIL YADAV
2014.11.27 14:25
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
CRA No.D-26-DB-2010 -20-
husband of the deceased was not paid the money out of the amount of the
compensation received by her father-in-law and she was annoyed due to
this reason. If that would have been so she could have grievance against
her husband and her father-in-law and would have involved them for the
commission of the offence but she has not involved her husband and
father-in-law for setting her on ablaze. This fact adds to the truthfulness
of the dying declaration. To support this view, reference can be made to
the cases Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2013(2) RCR (Criminal) 88 and
Annapurna Vs. State of UP 2013 (2) RCR (Criminal) 881.
Rakesh & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 22 March, 2013
In case Rakesh and another Vs. State of Haryana 2013
(3) RCR (criminal) 568 while recording the history of the patient the
doctor had noted that it was accidental fire while cooking food which
caused the burn injuries. Hon'ble Apex Court held that in view of the
categorical statement made by the deceased and her dying declaration to
the contrary, reference made by the doctor while recording the history of
the patient would not affect the prosecution case.