Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.25 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sabhajit Tewary vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 February, 1975
In Sabhajit Tewary Vs. Union of India , the Supreme Court held
that the CSIR was not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the
Constitution of India.
Chander Mohan Khanna vs National Council Of Educational ... on 17 September, 1991
In Chander Mohan Khanna vs. The National Council of
Educational Research & Training and other , the Supreme Court,
referring to its earlier Judgments in Sukhdev Singh (3-supra), Ramana
Dayaram Shetty (5-supra), Ajay Hasia (6-supra) etc., struck a note of
caution to the effect that these are merely indicative criteria and are by
no means conclusive and clinching in any case. In that case, the Supreme
Court held that the National Council for Educational Research and Training
(NCERT), which is an autonomous body, and whose activities are not
wholly related to the governmental functions, and the governmental control
was confined only to the proper utilization of the grant and its funding was
not entirely from government resources, did not satisfy the requirements of
State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
The Mysore Paper Mills Ltd vs The Mysore Paper Mills Officers' ... on 8 January, 2002
In Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Mysore Paper Mills Officers
Association , the Supreme Court held that a company substantially financed
and financially controlled by the Government, managed by a Board of
Directors nominated and removable at the instance of the Government and
carrying on important functions of public interest under the control of the
Government, is an authority within the meaning of Article 12.
Pradeep Kumar Biswas vs Indian Institute Of Chemical Biology & ... on 16 April, 2002
In a lucid exposition of the case law on the subject, Ruma Pal, J
speaking for herself, S.P.Barucha, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, N.
Santosh Hegde, and Arijit Pasayat, JJ, (R.C. Lahoti and Doraiswamy Raju,
JJ, dissenting) in Pradeep Kumar Biswas Vs. Indian Institute of
Chemical Biology and others , has succinctly summarized the law, at
para-40, as under :
Board For Control Of Cricket In India vs Jharkhand State Cricket Association ... on 16 April, 2008
In its latest Judgment, while considering whether the Board of
Control for Cricket in India and others Vs. Cricket Association of Bihar
and others , a two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court after widely
referring to the case law, held that while BCCI may not be State under
Article 12, but it is certainly amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226
of the Constitution of India having regard to the duties and functions it
discharges which are clearly public in nature.