Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)Section 203 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Chandra Deo Singh vs Prokash Chandra Bose & Anr on 22 January, 1963
11. Shri Mor, the Assistant Government Pleader submitted that reading Section 202, Cr.P.C. the Magistrate is not precluded in securing the presence of the accused for finding out the truth or falsity of the complaint. If the accused is to produce the same documents at the trial then there should be no prohibition if they are produced at the earlier stage of the enquiry to show that those documents would go a long way to show that there was no justification for the complainant to file a complaint. The submissions of Shri Mor are answered in the words of the Supreme Court and, therefore, I need not add anything beyond repeating the observations of the Court. The Supreme Court in Chandra Deo Singh v. Prokash Chandra Bose in placitum (b) observed as under-
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Section 79 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Hiralal Gulabchand Shah vs Keshavlal Parekh And Ors. on 5 July, 1963
10. Shri Palshikar also drew my attention to a third case of our High Court in Hiralal v. Keshavlal . The head-note runs as under: