Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.51 seconds)

A.T.Kearney India Ltd vs Income Tax Officer-Ward 1(1) , New Delhi on 16 September, 2014

7. Mr. Hossain submits that in view of the said appeal being preferred, the Tribunal should have adopted the same course as prescribed by this Court in A.T. Kearney India Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, (2015) 371 ITR 179. In that case, though the appeal had not been preferred against the order, setting aside the order which formed the basis for issuance of notice under Section 148, the period of limitation was still available. In that light, the Division Bench observed as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 5 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

M/S Taluk Agricultural Producers ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 7 September, 2018

7. It is clear that as the position stands today, the reasons do not survive. However, subsequently the position may be altered in case the Revenue files and appeal and succeeds therein. Therefore, the Revenue also has to be protected. Consequently, we are inclined to adopt the approach indicated in National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Circle 32(1), W.P.(C) 5895/2010 decided on 07.08.2014 wherein we passed the following order:-
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1