Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)Section 4 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Chandrabhan Chunnilal Gour vs Shrawan Kumar Khunnolal Gour And Anr. on 27 April, 1979
Shri Shah also relied on a Single Judge's decision of this Court in the case of Chandrabhan Chunnilal Gour v. Sharavan Kumar Khunnolal Gour, reported in 1980 Mh.L.J. 690 where the prior permission was held mandatory and the deed of conveyance was held to be ineffective in law if it was executed and registered before the permission was actually obtained.
Section 34 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Laxman Namdeo Gabale vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 20 August, 1977
6. Shri Shah, the learned Counsel for the respondent, has, on the other hand, strongly relied upon the judgment of the lower appellate Court. In particular, he invited my attention to an order of a Division Bench of this Court whereby Writ Petition No 2642 of 1986 claiming relief in identical circumstances was summarily dismissed on 14th June, 1988. It must, however, be pointed out in fairness to Shri Shah that he pointed out that he himself was the Counsel in that case and that the requisite price i.e. Nazarana in terms of section 4(2) of the Act was not paid in that case before the deed of conveyance was executed.
1