Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)
Gavin Mendes vs State Of Karnataka on 23 September, 2020 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

10. As already stated above, criminal prosecution can be allowed to proceed only when a prima facie offence said to have been committed by accused No.4 has been disclosed. It is pertinent to note that the accused Nos.1 to 3 have faced the trial in Sessions Case No.547/2015 before the LXVIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH-69) 12 and they have been acquitted of the offences alleged against them. The copy of the judgment dated 28.03.2019 furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the same. The charges against the present petitioner are also the same. Unless the chargesheet records reveal that the petitioner has actively involved with other accused in immoral trafficking or user of foreign girls by accused No.4 for the said purpose by specifically designing the website for them, the proceedings cannot be allowed to be continued against him. As such, the proceedings deserves to be quashed as per the parameters laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document
1   2 Next