Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madhya ... vs Seth Govindram Sugar Mills Ltd on 26 March, 1965
In Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Pradesh
Vs. Seth Govindram Sugar Mills, AIR 1966 SC 24, the
Hon'ble Apex Court has held that under Hindu Law
Coparcenership is a necessary qualification for the managership
of a joint hindu family. A widow is not a coparcener. She has no
legal qualification to become the manager of a joint hindu family.
A widow of a coparcener cannot, therefore, be a Karta of hindu
joint family.
Pandurang Mahadeo Kavade And Ors. vs Annaji Balwant Bokil And Ors. on 5 February, 1971
28. It would also be appropriate to mention here that the
possession of the suit land was given to Ramgopal (the purchaser)
in the year 1982 and he was in possession of the suit land after
the execution of the sale deeds (Ex. P/1 and Ex. P/2). Therefore,
without seeking a relief for possession, suit for declaration of the
sale deed as void, was not maintainable. As has been held in the
case of Pandurang Mahadeo Kavade (supra).
Brahmvart Sanathan Dharam Mahamandal, ... vs Prem Kumar & Ors on 10 May, 1985
In this regard reference can be
made to Brahmvart Sanathan Dharam Mahamandal Kanpur
Vs. Prem Kumar, 1985 (3) S.C.C 350.
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
1