Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)

Smt. Munoli Rajashri Karabasappa vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 7 September, 2021

"4. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents. Mr.Bhavake, learned counsel for the petitioners invited our attention to the judgment delivered by this Court on 10 th July, 2017 in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 filed by Smt.Munoli Rajashri Karabasappa vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. along with other connected writ petition. By the said judgment, this Court after considering the Government Resolution and after adverting to the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition Nos.10580 of 2015 with 1145 of 2016 decided on 9th March, 2017 held that the ban would not be applicable to three categories, (1) where the recruitment process is already commenced prior to Mugdha 22 of 25 23 Judgment-WP 4097-19.odt Government Resolution dated 2nd May, 2012. (2) Insofar as the appointment made for the subjects of English, Maths and Science are concerned (3) where the recruitment is made to fulfill the backlog of reserved category candidates. The subjects involved in these three writ petitions are English, the candidate belonged to Scheduled Tribe category and the subject Marathi. ................................"
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Hemant Vasant Kulkarni And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 18 December, 2018

23. A review of the communication dated 6 th March, 2010 from the Joint Secretary of Respondent No.1 to the Director Education, (Secondary and Higher Secondary) relied upon by the Petitioners also lends credence to the aforesaid views when it says in Paragraphs 3 and 4 Mugdha 19 of 25 20 Judgment-WP 4097-19.odt that the State Government has expressed its no objection to fill in the open category vacancy from the open category, even if there is a backlog in the reserved category. The said communication also refers to the order of this Court dated 23rd September, 2005 in Writ Petition No.5789 of 2005 in the case of Hemant Shankar Kulkarni & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. wherein this Court has held that even if there is a backlog in the reserved category, open category vacant posts can be filled in from the open category.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - N M Jamdar - Full Document
1