Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Action Committee On Issue Of Caste ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 18 July, 1994
The Central
Administrative Tribunal relied upon the judgments in
Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao's case and Action Committee
on Issue of Caste Certificate to Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes in the State of Maharashtra and another v. Union of
India and another (supra) and held that the Scheduled Castes
who migrated to the Union Territory of Pondicherry after
the issuance of Presidential notification, which has
specified Scheduled Castes in terms of Article 341 of the
Constitution cannot claim the benefit of reservation in the
services of the Government of Pondicherry. Accordingly,
the selection and appointment of migrant Scheduled Caste
candidates was set aside and a direction was issued to
review the selection process.
Article 342 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 330 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao vs Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College And Ors on 2 May, 1990
In Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao v. Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College and
others (supra), the Constitution Bench of Apex Court was
called upon to consider whether the petitioner, who was a
member of Scheduled Tribe in the State of Andhra Pradesh
was entitled to admission in MBBS course in Maharashtra
against the quota reserved for Scheduled Tribes. The
petitioner was born in Tenali in the State of Andhra
Pradesh and belonged to the Gouda community also known
as "Goudu" which is recognised as "Scheduled Tribe" in the
State of Andhra Pradesh. The father of the petitioner was
issued a Scheduled Tribe Certificate by the Tahsildar,
Tenali, Andhra Pradesh. He was appointed in the Fertilizer
Corporation of India, a public sector undertaking. On the
19th June, 1978, the petitioner's father joined Rashtriya
Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd., a Government of India
undertaking, under the quota reserved for Scheduled
Tribes. He was posted in Bombay. As a consequence, the
petitioner started living in Bombay. He completed his
education in Bombay. For the academic year 1989-90, he
submitted applications for admission in three medical
colleges run by the Bombay Municipal Corporation and one
medical college run by the State of Maharashtra and sought
the benefit of reservation in favour of Scheduled Tribes.
S. Pushpa And Others vs Sivachanmugavelu And Others on 11 February, 2005
In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the
case of S. Pushpa and Ors. V. Sivachanmugavelu &
Ors. (supra) and Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao's (supra),
we cannot accept the prayer No.1 and 2 of the petitioner
nor direct the respondents for issuance of caste certificate
in her favour nor we can issue directions to the
15
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE
Smt. Sangeeta Sadh versus The State of M.P. and others
(W. P. No.5934 of 2016 (o))
respondents to modify the notificaiton dated 13.1.2004 to
the extent that it should inclusive for the girls of reserved
category who born and brought up in any other State, but
married to the person who is permanent resident of the
State. On 1.9.2016, an interim order has been passed in
favour of the petitioner and on the basis of the aforesaid
interim order, she was permitted to participate in
counseling at Government College of Nursing and was
granted admission and, therefore, we permit her to
complete the course of the nursing from the Government
College, but she will not get any further benefit to treat as
Scheduled Caste in the State of M.P. as her husband also
belongs to the same caste (Kori), which is again a
Scheduled Caste.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 332 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mr. Subhash Chandra vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 9 July, 2009
11. The question whether a person, who is a Scheduled
Caste in the State where she was born will not be entitled to
the benefit of reservation after marriage in the State where
her husband is living despite the fact that the husband also
belongs to Scheduled Caste and the particular Caste falls in
the same reserved category in the State of migration and
that she is a permanent resident of that State has been
considered in the case of Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao
versus Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College and others
reported in (1990) 3 SCC 130, Action Committee on
Issue of Caste Certificate to Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes in the State of Maharashtra and
another versus Union of India and another reported
in (1994) 5 SCC 244 and Subhash Chandra and
another versus Delhi Subordinate Services
Selection Board and others reported in (2009) 15
SCC 458.