Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.70 seconds)
Kumaran Muthu @ Muthukumaran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 27 February, 2026 cites

T.T.Antony vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 12 July, 2001

36. If the prosecution possesses materials showing complicity of Accused No.6 and Accused No.7 in the later money trail, the appropriate course, consistent with T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala10, is to collect such material and proceed in accordance with 10 2001 (6) SCC 181 17/23 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 16/03/2026 01:17:47 pm ) Crl.O.P(MD)No.19923 of 2025 law within the framework of the earlier investigation in a legally permissible manner, rather than multiplying proceedings on overlapping allegations which are, in substance, part of the same transaction stream.
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 980 - S S Quadri - Full Document

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

28. The law is settled that though the Hon'ble High Court possesses inherent power to quash proceedings on settlement in appropriate cases, as recognised in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab6 and restated in Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat7, and that such power is not to be exercised mechanically where the alleged offence bears a public element, involves economic wrongdoing, or where the allegations indicate a broader pattern affecting persons beyond the immediate complainant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1   2 Next