Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.20 seconds)
Sunil Kumar Malik vs Govt. Of Nctd on 9 December, 2015 cites

Shankarsan Dash vs Union Of India on 30 April, 1991

12. As to the correctness of the CAT's view with regard to the validity of the licence, this Court wholly affirms the decision of the CAT that neither the employer, nor the judicial authority- in this case the CAT, is expected to go into the validity or otherwise of the documents furnished by the candidate. At the stage of securing employment, the candidates had to disclose all particulars truly and faithfully. Any cloud of suspicion over such candidature, would disentitle him the right to be appointed. There is authority for the proposition that the public employer is not obliged to issue appointment letter merely because someone's name figures in the select list. It is open to the employer- if circumstances so justify, to either seek recourse to the list partially, or to entirely cancel the process (Shankaran Dash v. Union of India, (1991) 3 SCC 47). In the present case, the materials on record, in the form of the report which was considered by the Police Commissioner, according to Court's opinion, constituted sufficient reason for the cancellation of the petitioner's candidature. The Tribunal's finding upon its elaborate analysis of the fact cannot be faulted with.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 1160 - L M Sharma - Full Document

Rubi(Chandra) Dutta vs M/S United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 18 March, 2011

5. Keeping in view the fact that the decision of the learned Tribunal is based on the inquiry conducted by the Crime Branch of Delhi Police, we hardly find any tangible reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Tribunal. The Tribunal has also referred to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Rubi (Chandra) Dutta vs. United India Insurance Company Limited,: (2011) 11 SCC 269, wherein the Supreme Court held that at the time of giving employment to a driver, the owner is required to be satisfied apropos the correctness and genuineness of the licence he was holding.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 420 - D Verma - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sucha Singh And Ors. on 29 September, 1993

The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sucha Singh (supra) that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of Section 15 of the Act, propounds a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the world over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion. What was originally a forgery would remain null and void forever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sanctification subsequently done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 77 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Police, Delhi ... on 9 September, 2014

3. Besides, it is worth to note that in terms of the Order under review a batch of Original Applications was decided and certain applicants 3 whose Original Applications were decided along with the batch of Original Applications had approached the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by way of W.P. (C) No.5987/2014 (Manoj Kumar v. The Commissioner of Police & others) and W.P. (C) No.961/2015 (Rajnikant v. The Commissioner of Police & another). Both the Writ Petitions were dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court in terms of Orders dated 09.09.2014 and 02.02.2015 respectively, with the following observations:-
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 3 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1   2 Next