Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Jai Rani vs Om Parkash Saini on 7 October, 1983
In Jai Rani's case (supra), a learned Single Judge of this Court has taken a view that the liability of the petitioner to pay maintenance would be only for a period up to the stay of the proceedings, but in case he revives the proceedings, he would be liable to pay all arrears of maintenance. The question is whether the application filed by the respondent would amount to revival of the proceedings.
P.S. Devarajan vs R. Geetha on 29 February, 2000
10. The last judgment referred to is of the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court in P.S. Devarajan v. R. Geetha 2000 MLR 510. In this judgment, it has been held that when a court stays the proceedings and directs that no order will be passed thereon, it is not terminating the proceedings.
1