Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 33 in The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
Section 80 in The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
Section 33 in Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 [Entire Act]
Jayaprakash.P.K vs The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 31 March, 2010
This Court has, in Jayaprakash's case (supra),
held that co-operative societies are duty bound to appoint
qualified disabled candidates against identified posts even in
the absence of reservation for the physically handicapped
having found a place in the notification. This finding of the
learned single Judge has also been affirmed by a Division
Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 9.06.2014 in
W.A.No.103 of 2014.
Section 5 in The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
Union Of India & Anr vs National Federation Of The Blind & Ors on 8 October, 2013
E.Dineshan [2016(2) KHC 910(DB)]. It was contended by
the KPSC in that case that the identification of posts having
been made by the Government only from 01.01.2008 the
direction given by the learned single Judge to make
appointments against vacancies which had arisen earlier
also applying the 3% reservation was erroneous. It was held
that going by the provision of the PWD Act and the
authoritative pronouncement of law made by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court, reservation which is not dependant on the
identification of the posts should be deemed to have come
W.A. No.671/16
12
into operation with effect from the date of commencement of
the Act. The vacancies earmarked for physically
handicapped under the PWD Act were to be reckoned not
from the date of identification of the posts, but with effect
from the date of commencement of the Act or at least the
entrustment of the selection to the said post to the PSC. The
direction given to appoint persons with disabilities against
the quota earmarked for the disabled was thus upheld.
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1