Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.49 seconds)Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
7. Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of 'Associate
Builders vs. Delhi Development Authority', (2015) 3 SCC 49 has
held that the interference with an arbitral award is permissible
only when the findings of the arbitrator are arbitrary, capricious
or perverse or when conscience of the Court is shocked or when
illegality is not trivial but goes to the root of the matter. It is held
that once it is found that the arbitrator's approach is neither
arbitrary nor capricious, no interference is called for on facts. The
arbitrator is ultimately a master of the quantity and quality of
evidence while drawing the arbitral award.
M/S Dyna Technologies Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Crompton Greaves Ltd. on 18 December, 2019
In Dyna Technologies
(supra) Hon'ble Supreme Court further observed as under :
Mahipal Singh Tomar vs State Of U.P. & Others on 3 February, 2010
The two decisions relied upon by the
Respondent have no application to the facts of
the present case. It would depend upon facts of
each case as to whether the principles are
applicable. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Mahipal Singh Tomar v State of Uttar
Pradesh, (2013) 12 SCALE 304 held that even
in administrative law, the rule of natural
justice have traditionally been regarded as
OMP (Comm)- 37/19 Delhi Jal Board vs. Chaitanya Constructions Co. Page 26 of 30
comprising "audi alteram partem" and "nemo
judex in causa sua". Where non-grant of
opportunity results in civil / financial
consequences or deprivation of property or
entitlement, it becomes: necessary to grant the
affected person opportunity to project its
stand. Undisputedly, the order of black listing /
stoppage of payment have resulted
civil/financial consequences.
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 11 November, 1974
In fact in cases
relating to black listing, decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Erusian Equipment
& Chemicals Ltd v State of West Bengal,
(1975) 1 SCC 70 applies. The said decision is
applicable to the facts of the present case. In
any event, undisputably by its order, learned
Civil Judge-06 (Central) Tis Hazari Courts
has stayed the operation of black listing by
order dated 13.04.2017 which continues to be
operative.
Lalita Jalan And Anr vs Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. And Ors on 16 April, 2003
"Withholding" - The dictionary
meaning of the word "withholding" is to be hold
back; to keep back; to restrain ore decline to
grant. The holding back or keeping backing is not
an isolated act but is a continuous process. Lalit
Jalan and another v. Bombay Goa Co. Ltd others,
(2003) 6 SCC 107.