Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)

Lakshmi Rattan Engineering Works Ltd vs Asstt. Commr. Sales Tax, Kanpur & Anr on 12 September, 1967

13. Mr. Lalit submitted that in the case of Lakshmi Rattan Engineering Works Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Sales Tax, Kanpur, [(1968) 1 SCR 565] this Court was called upon to consider the expression `entertain' in the proviso to Section 9 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, dealing with appeals and it was held by a three-Judge Bench that the expression `entertain' meant the first occasion on which the Court took up the matter for consideration. But where an appeal was automatically admitted under the Rules the first occasion for the Court to take up the appeal would be when the appeal came up for hearing. It was also held that before the appeal could be taken up for hearing, it would have to be proved to the satisfaction of the officer concerned that the tax had been paid and in time.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 54 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document

State Of Haryana vs M/S.Maruti Udyog Ltd. & Ors on 7 September, 2000

14. Mr. Lalit submitted that a similar view had been expressed by this Court in State of Haryana vs. Maruti Udyog Limited [(2000) 7 11 SCC 348] where Section 39 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, was in question and where similar provisions were included and it was held that the word `entertain' would mean when the case is taken up by the Court for the first time, or, in other words, when satisfactory proof had been made available that the tax in question had been deposited.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 50 - Full Document
1