Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.70 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Dhingra Metal Works on 4 October, 2010

27. In the present case, the assessing officer found nothing incriminating to justify the addition of Rs. 22.25 Crore except the confession made by the then director of the AssesseeCompany (which has been retracted letter ) apart from a loose sheet. As discussed in the above paras, the statement cannot be held as conclusive proof to make an addition. Hence, the ratio laid down in the above decisions in the case of CIT v. Dhingra Metal Works (supra) and Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-2(1) v. Bansal Credits Ltd, (supra) are applicable to the case in hand.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 88 - Manmohan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next