Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.05 seconds)
L N Malviya Infra Projects Pvt Ltd vs National Highways Authority Of India ... on 8 August, 2017
cites
Section 394 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 11 November, 1974
In Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd v. State
W.P.(C) 3326/2017 Page 8 of 23
of West Bengal & Anr: AIR 1975 SC 266, the Supreme Court observed
that:-
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gorkha Security Services vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 4 August, 2014
M/S Kulja Industries Ltd vs Chief Gen.Manager W.T.Proj.Bsnl & Ors on 4 October, 2013
In Kulja Industries Ltd. v. Chief General Manager,
Western Telecom Project BSNL & Ors: AIR 2014 SC 9, the Supreme
Court had summarised the factors which were required to be considered
W.P.(C) 3326/2017 Page 9 of 23
while imposing punitive measures such as blacklisting and/or excluding a
person from participating in contracts awarded by the State. The relevant
extract of the said decision is set out below:-
R.K.Associates vs The Managing Director, Irctc & Anr. on 14 January, 2009
23. This thought was also expressed by this Court in R.K. Associates v.
The Managing Director, IRCTC & Anr.: ILR (2009) Supp.(7) Delhi 1.
Given the serious consequences of such punitive measure, the Courts have
in a number of decisions emphasized the standards and relevant factors on
the anvil of which the question of imposing the penalty of blacklisting
must be evaluated.
1