Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)
Dr Geetha V vs State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2019 cites

Union Of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr on 6 November, 1978

The test to determine a prima facie case would naturally depend upon the facts of each case and no straight jacket formula or universal law can be made in this behalf. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Profulla Kumar Samal and another reported in (1979) 3 SCC 4, wherein at paragraph 10 it has been observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 1736 - S M Ali - Full Document

Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat & Ors vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 9 November, 2012

13. It is well settled proposition of law that truthfulness of allegations could not be determined while framing charges and that can be ascertained only after conclusion of trial. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another reported in (2013) 11 SCC 476, wherein at paragraph 21 it has been observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 221 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Cbi, Hyderabad vs K. Narayana Rao on 21 September, 2012

are entitled to proceed under criminal prosecution. Such tangible materials are lacking in the case of the petitioners, that has to be considered only at the time of trial. This proposition of law has also been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. K.Narayana Rao reported in (2012) 9 SCC 512, wherein at paragraphs 30 and 31 it has been observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 433 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1