Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.44 seconds)M.P.State Co-Op.Dairy Fedn.Ltd.& Anr vs Rajnesh Kumar Jamindar & Ors on 15 April, 2009
43. "It is now a well-settled principle of law that the employer
would be bound by the rule of game. It must follow the
standard laid down by itself. If procedures have been laid
down for arriving at some kinds of decisions, the same
should substantially be complied with even if the same
are directory in nature.
Baikuntha Nath Das And Anr vs Chief Distt. Medical Officer, Baripada ... on 19 February, 1992
(11) In the Case of "Baikuntha Nath Das and another versus Chief
District Medical Officer, Baripada and another" reported in (1992) 2 SCC
299 principles relating to compulsory retirement has been enumerated by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court as under:
State Of Gujarat vs Umedbhai M. Patel on 27 February, 2001
(12) In the case of "State of Gujarat versus Umedbhai M. Patel" reported
in (2001) 3 SCC 314, the principles relating to compulsory retirement has
been summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as under :
L.C. Bawa vs V.K. Kapoor And Anr. on 1 May, 1987
In the case of "L.C. Bawa vs.
V.K. Kapoor and Anr., 1987 LAB. I.C. 1878", a Division Bench of the Delhi
High Court while interpreting rule 56 (j) of the Fundamental Rules has held
that the order of pre-mature compulsory retirement of a Government
servant can be passed only by giving him notice of not less than three
months in writing or three months' pay and allowances in lieu of such
notices.
Cantonment Executive Officer & Anr vs Vijay D. Wani & Ors on 16 April, 2008
(17) In the case of "Cantonment Executive Officer and Another Vs. Vijay
D. Wani and Others". reported in (2008) 12 SCC 230, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court has ordered payment of 50 % back wages to the employee. It has
been held;
State Of U.P. & Ors vs Ram Daras Yadav on 4 December, 2009
(18) Similar is the view taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of "Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Through Management Vs. National Coal
Workers Congress", reported in (2009) 7 SCC 160 and in the case of
"State of Uttar Pradesh and Others Vs. Ram Daras Yadav", reported in
(2010) 2 SCC 236.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hindustan Motors Ltd vs Tapan Kumar Bhattacharya & Anr on 12 July, 2002
(16) In the case of "Hindustan Motors Limited Vs. Tapan Kumar
Bhattacharya and Another" reported in (2002) 6 SCC 41, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court while examining the matter in which the employee was
dismissed from service and he remained unemployed for more than ten
years, has held that since there is no pleading in respect to such claim of
petitioner, therefore, payment of 50% back wages can be ordered.
M/S. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Thr. Mangt vs National Coal Workers Congress Thr. V.P on 7 July, 2009
(18) Similar is the view taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of "Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Through Management Vs. National Coal
Workers Congress", reported in (2009) 7 SCC 160 and in the case of
"State of Uttar Pradesh and Others Vs. Ram Daras Yadav", reported in
(2010) 2 SCC 236.
1