Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)
The Divisional Manager, Forest ... vs Shri Rajendra Vasant Karpe on 24 December, 2025 cites

Chief Conservator Of Forests And ... vs Jagannath Maruti Kondhare, Etc. Etc. on 6 December, 1995

16. We do not find that the observations of the learned Single Judge referring to the decision of the Supreme Court in Chief Conservator of Forests & Anr. vs. Jagannath Maruti Kondhare (supra) were in any manner misplaced. On perusal of the said decision, it is clear that the Supreme Court was dealing with the Forest Department of the State Government implementing the scheme at Panchgaon Parwati as framed by it intending to fulfill the recreational and educational aspirations of public as also undertaking social forestry work meant for the preservation of forests and environment could not be regarded as a part of sovereign function of the State, hence for the workers who were engaged to perform work under the said scheme, there was no embargo to invoke the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act as also Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, (for short 'MRTU & PULP Act'). The Supreme Court held that the department of the State Government is an industry and the employees employed on daily wages were covered and protected by the State Acts. Learned Single Judge, in our opinion, Page 22 of 32 24 December 2025 LPA [email protected] has rightly applied the said decision of the Supreme Court in the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 289 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

Delhi Development Horticulture ... vs Delhi Administration, Delhi And Ors on 4 February, 1992

Insofar as the decisions as cited on behalf of the appellant in case of Delhi Development Horticulture vs. Delhi Administration (supra), Mahatma Phule vs. Nashik Zilla Kamgar (supra) and Ahmednagar Zilla vs. Dinkar Rao Kalyanrao Jagdale (supra) are concerned, in the facts of the present case, these judgments are not applicable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 420 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Mahatma Phule Agricultural University ... vs Nasik Zilla Sheth Kamgar Union And Ors on 24 July, 2001

Insofar as the decisions as cited on behalf of the appellant in case of Delhi Development Horticulture vs. Delhi Administration (supra), Mahatma Phule vs. Nashik Zilla Kamgar (supra) and Ahmednagar Zilla vs. Dinkar Rao Kalyanrao Jagdale (supra) are concerned, in the facts of the present case, these judgments are not applicable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 184 - S N Variava - Full Document
1   2 Next