Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.53 seconds)

M/S K.B.Saha And Sons Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Development Consultant Ltd on 12 May, 2008

13. In Ameer Minhaj Vs. dierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar6, the core issue considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court was whether the agreement dated 09.07.2003, on the basis of which relief for specific performance was claimed, could be received in evidence as it was not a registered document. The Hon'ble Supreme Court elaborately considered the provisions of Sections 17 and 49 of the 6 (2018) 7 SCC 639 PNR,J & Dr.GRR,J CMA No.519 OF 2021 13 Act 1908, noticed the principles delineated in K.B.Saha (supra) and S.Kaladevi (supra). Paragraph No.12 reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 220 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

S.Kaladevi vs V.R.Somasundaram & Ors on 12 April, 2010

13. In Ameer Minhaj Vs. dierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar6, the core issue considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court was whether the agreement dated 09.07.2003, on the basis of which relief for specific performance was claimed, could be received in evidence as it was not a registered document. The Hon'ble Supreme Court elaborately considered the provisions of Sections 17 and 49 of the 6 (2018) 7 SCC 639 PNR,J & Dr.GRR,J CMA No.519 OF 2021 13 Act 1908, noticed the principles delineated in K.B.Saha (supra) and S.Kaladevi (supra). Paragraph No.12 reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 198 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Bondar Singh & Ors vs Nihal Singh & Ors on 4 March, 2003

In Bondar Singh and Others Vs. Nihal Singh and Others3, suit was instituted praying to grant declaration that plaintiffs had become owners of the suit lands by adverse possession and also sought for injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the possession of plaintiffs on the suit lands. The claim of possession is traceable to an unregistered sale deed dated 09.05.1931. The Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the issue whether the unregistered sale deed can be looked in to assess the possession claim. On thoroughly analyzing the evidence on record, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 320 - A Kumar - Full Document
1   2 Next