Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.40 seconds)The Arms Act, 1959
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 300 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shri Brij Pal Singh vs Cbi on 6 May, 2011
In the aforesaid case, it has also been laid down by the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi that :
" The law is settled that even in a criminal prosecution, when
a witness is crossexamined and contradicted with the leave of
the court by the party calling, his evidence cannot, as a matter
of law, be treated as washed off the record altogether. It is for
the Judge of fact to consider in each case, whether as a
result of such crossexamination, the witness stands thoroughly
discredited or can still be believed in regard to a part of the
S.C No. 136/07 30/44
31
testimony. If the judge finds that in the process, the credit of
the witness has not been completely shaken, he may, after
reading and considering the evidence of the witness, as a
whole, with due caution and care, accept, in the light of the
other evidence on the record, that part of his testimony which
he finds to be creditworthy and act upon it."
Radha Mohan Singh @ Lal Saheb & Others vs State Of U.P on 20 January, 2006
In the aforesaid case titled as "Radha Mohan Singh @ Lal Saheb &
Ors. Vs. State of U.P' (cited as AIR 2006 SC 951)," it has been laid down by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India that :
" It is well settled that the evidence of a prosecution witness
cannot be rejected in toto merely because the prosecution
chose to treat him as hostile and crossexamined him. The
evidence of such witness cannot be treated as effaced or
washed off the record altogether but the same can be
accepted to the extent his version is found to be dependable on
a careful scrutiny thereof."
Section 336 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Smt. Sandhya Jadhav vs State Of Maharashtra on 31 March, 2006
In the case titled as "Sandhya Jadhav VS. State of Maharashtra
( reported as (2006) 4 SCC 653)", it has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India that :
" For bringing in operation of Exception 4 to Section 300
IPC, it has to be established that the act was committed
without premeditation , in a sudden fight in the heat of
passion upon a sudden quarrel without the offender having
taken undue advantage and not having acted in a cruel or
unusual manner.